🔗 Share this article

An activist group has stated to have scraped a vast number of tracks from Spotify and is preparing to release them publicly.

Potential Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Development

Observers noted the apparent leak could aid AI companies looking for material to train their models.

A group called Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million entries of associated data such as performer and record names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million tracks, stated that the breach did not represent its full catalog.

“We have identified and disabled the nefarious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” said a company representative.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorized access found a third party scraped public metadata and employed illicit tactics to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Declared Goal and Concerns

The streaming service does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They asserted the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a means of exchanging large data files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s information and heritage”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Battleground

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ rights, remarked the leaked music would probably be utilized for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on pirated material is sadly common in the AI industry, so this accessed music is almost certain to be used instructing AI models,” he stated.

The group's website makes references to a large online archive, a vast online repository of copyrighted books that has reportedly been used by Meta to develop its systems.

A founder of an AI startup wrote on the professional network that members of the public could in theory “create their own personal free equivalent of Spotify”. The executive added it could also allow tech companies to “train on modern music at a large volume”.

Copyright has emerged as a battleground between creatives, writers and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Proposals and Reactions

Across Britain, creative professionals have raised concerns against a ministerial proposal to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without permission unless the rights holder signals. Virtually every respondent to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for science, research and development told parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The government has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.